I believe that certain things being for sale is an issue and
one thing from Sandel’s list that I believe shouldn't be for sale is: “The
right to emit a metric ton of carbon into the atmosphere.” I don’t see the
value or convenience in a company wanting to purposely add pollution into the
atmosphere. It’s a waste of money and it depletes the efforts of people wanting
to lessen the pollution on Earth. The companies who opt to do such a thing,
shouldn't be allowed to in the first place no matter who is profiting from it. As
years go by, problems like this could get worse. Companies would be putting
humanity at risk by deliberately adding pollution. They should in fact try to
find other and efficient ways to get rid of their pollution. If this can’t be
done, countries should try to regulate these practices and try to not let
companies do it at all. Anything that could potentially put others at risk is
something that shouldn't have money be put in to. Opposers may say that
companies need ways to get rid of things and profiting from it is even better,
but I just see it as a sign of greed and carelessness for the environment. There
is only one Earth and we should be doing actions that are beneficial to its
future. Just because there aren't significant effects of this kind of pollution
or it may not seem to be harming us now, doesn't mean that it won’t in the long
run. Continuing such practices would only be going against the cause.
No comments:
Post a Comment